Ambassador Ogorry sues Sahara Reporters, Sowore over alleged false, security-threatening publication

Ambassador Adebayo Lion Ogorry has filed a major lawsuit against Sahara Reporters Ltd. and its publisher, Omoyele Sowore, accusing them of releasing a false and reckless publication that allegedly threatens national security.

The suit, marked FCT/HC/CV/4767/2025, was lodged at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja. It stems from a November 19, 2025 article titled:

“EXCLUSIVE: How Tinubu’s Defence Minister Matawalle Maintains Contact With Bandit Leaders, Ordered Them To Compel Communities To Vote For APC Former Aide.”

Ambassador Ogorry says the report is malicious, unfounded, and capable of inciting public fear. The publication, he argues, falsely accuses the Minister of State for Defence, Dr. Bello Matawalle, of maintaining links with bandit leaders and influencing communities to support the All Progressives Congress (APC).

According to the court filings, Ogorry alleges the story undermines counter-terrorism operations, endangers public safety, and violates the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act 2015.

In his supporting affidavit, Ogorry notes that the article was widely shared across Sahara Reporters’ website, social media pages, and messaging platforms. He cites Section 39(3)(a) of the Constitution, which restricts speech that endangers national security, and Sections 24(1)(a) & (b) of the Cybercrimes Act, which prohibit false or harmful information intended to cause alarm or ill-will.

“The defendants’ reckless actions have not only tarnished the reputation of a dedicated public servant but have also compromised ongoing military operations against banditry and terrorism,” Ogorry said. “This publication promotes distrust, exposes the Minister to risks, and undermines the morale of our armed forces.”

Reliefs Sought

Ambassador Ogorry is asking the court for:

A declaration that the publication is false, misleading, malicious, and not protected under freedom of expression.

A declaration that the report constitutes restricted speech that endangers national security.

A declaration that Sahara Reporters violated provisions of the Cybercrimes Act.

An injunction restraining further circulation of the story or similar publications targeting Dr. Matawalle.

An order compelling a 14-day public retraction and apology across Sahara Reporters’ platforms.

N10 billionin general and exemplary damages.

He argues that the article relied on unverified claims from an alleged former aide and lacked any official documentation, describing it as unethical journalism. Ogorry references legal precedents, including President F.R.N. v. ISA (2017) and Guardian Newspapers v. AIEH (2011), to support his claim that free speech does not protect irresponsible reporting that threatens national security.

“This lawsuit is not just about correcting a falsehood; it’s about safeguarding Nigeria’s democracy and ensuring media accountability,” he added.

The case has been scheduled for hearing in the Abuja Judicial Division.