Ogun tribunal: Akinlade highlights contrasts between 2019 and 2023 petitions

Adekunle Akinlade, the deputy governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Ogun State, has responded to those mocking him over the failure of his 2019 election petition, asserting that the circumstances in 2023 are distinct from the previous election.

Akinlade conveyed that the 2023 petitioners are eagerly anticipating the All Progressives Congress (APC) to defend the allegations against it and its candidate at the Ogun governorship election petition tribunal.

Addressing Ogun APC loyalists, Akinlade urged them not to pass judgment on the 2023 petition based on the outcome of his 2019 petition against the ruling party when he contested under the Allied People’s Movement (APM).

As the PDP governorship candidate wrapped up his case, calling 94 witnesses and presenting 200,000 exhibits, loyalists of the APC on social media platforms compared Adebutu’s petition to Akinlade’s 2019 case, speculating its potential failure.

Ogun’s APC Publicity Secretary, Tunde Oladunjoye, described the PDP petition, its evidence, and reports as “wishy-washy,” suggesting that PDP’s evidence and witnesses were influenced and paid for by the party and its candidate.

Contrarily, Akinlade asserted that the ongoing petition is a well-planned strategic process by the Ogun State PDP. He emphasized that the current petition is thoughtfully crafted and diligently executed by the PDP, having learned from the 2019 experience.

In response to online posts mocking the 2019 election and petition, Akinlade clarified that the 2023 petition is distinct in its approach and the dedication of those involved, including the legal team led by Hon. Ladi Adebutu.

He emphasized the commitment of PDP stakeholders in Ogun to gather relevant INEC election materials without any ulterior motives, differentiating their approach from APC stakeholders.

Looking ahead, Akinlade pointed out that as INEC opens its defense on August 2, 2023, the nation will be eagerly awaiting to see how both APC and the 2nd Respondent present their defense. He asserted that ample evidence has been presented before the tribunal, highlighting the importance of supporting arguments with facts and alternative evidence to defend against allegations of electoral malpractice.

Akinlade also mentioned that technological advancements have strengthened the electoral process and the tribunal, while the new Electoral Act clearly outlines the consequences of noncompliance. He concluded that the people of Ogun State await the outcome with great interest.